Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLeerkes, A.
dc.contributor.authorMaliepaard, M.
dc.contributor.authorMeer, M. van der
dc.coverage.spatialNederlandnl_NL
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-24T22:03:15Z
dc.date.available2022-10-24T22:03:15Z
dc.date.issued2022-10-25
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12832/3210
dc.description.abstractEach year the Member States of the European Union issue around 500,000 return decisions to persons who do not, or no longer, have legal stay. A return decision requires the person to leave the territory of the state issuing the return decision and to go to a country where he/she does have legal stay, usually his/her country of citizenship. If persons do not leave themselves, they risk being returned by force. The implementation of assisted and forced return often requires cooperation by the countries of citizenship of the person receiving the return decision, and thus partially depends on the intergovernmental relations between EU+ (EU Member States plus Norway, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom) and non-EU+ countries. The WODC has conducted three interrelated studies on the influence of these relations on return. Having developed a fitting analytical strategy, and with awareness of the data’s limitations, Part 2 (Leerkes, Maliepaard and Van der Meer, 2022) set about answering the main research questions of the project. We employed advanced quantitative analysis to estimate the effects of different intergovernmental return frameworks on the rate of enforced return from EU+ countries to non-EU+ countries. The term intergovernmental return framework pertains to all texts in which states describe how they will cooperate on enforced return (examples are ‘Readmission Agreement’, ‘Memorandum of Understanding’, ‘Mobility Partnership’, ‘Exchange of letters’, and so forth). CONTENT Introduction Return frameworks and plausible effects on enforced return Methods Results Conclusion See External links for Part 1 and 3 of this reserch.
dc.publisherWODCnl_NL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMemorandum 2022-02nl_NL
dc.relation.urihttps://www.wodc.nl/actueel/nieuws/2022/10/25/terugkeerafspraken-dragen-beperkt-bij-aan-terugkeer-migranten
dc.relation.urlhttps://repository.wodc.nl/handle/20.500.12832/3209
dc.relation.urlhttps://repository.wodc.nl/handle/20.500.12832/3211
dc.relation.urlUitgeprocedeerden
dc.subjectTerugkeerbeleidnl_NL
dc.subjectClassificatienl_NL
dc.subjectEuropese unienl_NL
dc.subjectDerde landennl_NL
dc.subjectDerdelandersnl_NL
dc.subjectVreemdelingenbeleidnl_NL
dc.subjectEffectiviteit en efficiencynl_NL
dc.subjectOnderzoeksmethodenl_NL
dc.subjectInternationale samenwerkingnl_NL
dc.subjectVreemdelingenbeleidnl_NL
dc.titleIntergovernmental relations and return - Part 2: From paper to practice?nl_NL
dc.title.alternativeEU-wide and bilateral return frameworks between EU+ and non EU+ countries and their effects on enforced returnnl_NL
dc.typeRapportnl_NL
dc.identifier.project3195bnl_NL
html.description.abstractEach year the Member States of the European Union issue around 500,000 return decisions to persons who do not, or no longer, have legal stay. A return decision requires the person to leave the territory of the state issuing the return decision and to go to a country where he/she does have legal stay, usually his/her country of citizenship. If persons do not leave themselves, they risk being returned by force. The implementation of assisted and forced return often requires cooperation by the countries of citizenship of the person receiving the return decision, and thus partially depends on the intergovernmental relations between EU+ (EU Member States plus Norway, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom) and non-EU+ countries. The WODC has conducted three interrelated studies on the influence of these relations on return.<P>Having developed a fitting analytical strategy, and with awareness of the data’s limitations, Part 2 (Leerkes, Maliepaard and Van der Meer, 2022) set about answering the main research questions of the project. We employed advanced quantitative analysis to estimate the effects of different intergovernmental return frameworks on the rate of enforced return from EU+ countries to non-EU+ countries. The term intergovernmental return framework pertains to all texts in which states describe how they will cooperate on enforced return (examples are ‘Readmission Agreement’, ‘Memorandum of Understanding’, ‘Mobility Partnership’, ‘Exchange of letters’, and so forth).<P><B>CONTENT</B><OL><LI>Introduction <LI>Return frameworks and plausible effects on enforced return <LI>Methods <LI>Results <LI>Conclusion </LI></OL><P>See External links for <B>Part 1 and 3</B> of this reserch.nl_NL
dc.contributor.institutionWODCnl_NL
dc.source.cityDen Haagnl_NL


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Memorandum 2022-2-part-2-fullt ...
Size:
1.556Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Memorandum 2022-2 fulltext
Thumbnail
Name:
Overkoepelende-samenvatting-en ...
Size:
469.5Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Memorandum 2022-2 samenvatting
Thumbnail
Name:
Overarching-summary-and-conclu ...
Size:
470.7Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Memorandum 2022-2 summary

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record