Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBoer, M. den (ed.)
dc.contributor.authorDoelle, P. (ed.)
dc.coverage.spatialNederland
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-22T13:14:49Z
dc.date.available2021-01-22T13:14:49Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12832/2538
dc.description.abstractIn order to ensure optimal comparability between the research findings, a joint standard questionnaire4 was designed. One of the main reference points in the questionnaire was a series of EU legal instruments, which have been adopted in the field of justice and home affairs cooperation (Title VI Treaty on European Union). In particular the recommendations of the 1997 High Level Group Action Plan on Organised Crime — which pertain to the creation of national contact points and national coordination centres — offered both a functional and comparative perspective on the adaptation of national law enforcement structures to the threat of organised crime. The questionnaire covered the following fields:General characteristics of the national criminal justice systems, in particular the organisational structures of the police service and the prosecution service;Reorganisation or structural adaptation flowing from or related to the EU legal instruments (e.g. the 1997 EU Action Plan on Organised Crime, the 1991 EC Money Laundering Directive);Reorganisation relevant to the control of organised crime, but not directly related to European influences (e.g. flowing from national parliamentary inquiries);Main structures for international cooperation, in particular the organisation of international information and intelligence flows;Multidisciplinary cooperation structures with bodies other than police or prosecution (e.g. customs service, intelligence service, special investigation services, financial intelligence units, private investigation departments, and private security companies);Accountability systems and authorisation procedures relating to the investigation of organised crime cases;The rationale, the acceptance and the expected effectiveness of the reorganisation or reforms within the police and/or prosecution service.
dc.publisherEuropean Institute of Public Administration
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWODC Rapport 98.134a
dc.subjectGeorganiseerde criminaliteit
dc.subjectBelgie
dc.subjectSpanje
dc.subjectFinland
dc.subjectVergelijkend onderzoek
dc.subjectZweden
dc.subjectItalie
dc.subjectBestrijding
dc.subjectFrankrijk
dc.subjectDuitsland
dc.subjectIerland
dc.subjectOpenbaar ministerie
dc.subjectLuxemburg
dc.subjectEuropese politiele samenwerking
dc.subjectOostenrijk
dc.subjectPolitieteam
dc.subjectDenemarken
dc.subjectGroot-Brittannie
dc.subjectEuropese unie
dc.subjectGriekenland
dc.subjectPolitieorganisatie
dc.titleControlling organised crime
dc.title.alternativeOrganisational changes in the law enforcement and prosecution services of the EU member states
dc.typerapport
dc.identifier.project98.134A
refterms.dateFOA2021-01-22T13:14:49Z
html.description.abstractIn order to ensure optimal comparability between the research findings, a joint standard questionnaire4 was designed. One of the main reference points in the questionnaire was a series of EU legal instruments, which have been adopted in the field of justice and home affairs cooperation (Title VI Treaty on European Union). In particular the recommendations of the 1997 High Level Group Action Plan on Organised Crime — which pertain to the creation of national contact points and national coordination centres — offered both a functional and comparative perspective on the adaptation of national law enforcement structures to the threat of organised crime. The questionnaire covered the following fields:General characteristics of the national criminal justice systems, in particular the organisational structures of the police service and the prosecution service;Reorganisation or structural adaptation flowing from or related to the EU legal instruments (e.g. the 1997 EU Action Plan on Organised Crime, the 1991 EC Money Laundering Directive);Reorganisation relevant to the control of organised crime, but not directly related to European influences (e.g. flowing from national parliamentary inquiries);Main structures for international cooperation, in particular the organisation of international information and intelligence flows;Multidisciplinary cooperation structures with bodies other than police or prosecution (e.g. customs service, intelligence service, special investigation services, financial intelligence units, private investigation departments, and private security companies);Accountability systems and authorisation procedures relating to the investigation of organised crime cases;The rationale, the acceptance and the expected effectiveness of the reorganisation or reforms within the police and/or prosecution service.nl_NL
dc.identifier.tuduuid:e0aacab3-93fb-4ba4-aa9a-fe43e2c4316b
dc.contributor.institutionEuropean Institute of Public Administration
dc.contributor.institutionWODC
dc.source.cityMaastricht


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
98.134a-volledige-tekst-dl-1_t ...
Size:
2.171Mb
Format:
PDF
Thumbnail
Name:
98.134a-volledige-tekst-dl-2_t ...
Size:
2.329Mb
Format:
PDF
Thumbnail
Name:
98.134a-volledige-tekst-dl-3_t ...
Size:
1.582Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record