Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEerten, J.-J. van
dc.contributor.authorDoosje, B.
dc.contributor.authorKonijn, E.
dc.contributor.authorGraaf, B. de
dc.contributor.authorGoede, M. de
dc.coverage.spatialNederland
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-22T13:13:27Z
dc.date.available2021-01-22T13:13:27Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12832/2215
dc.description.abstractIn this report, the authors examine the extent to which counter-narrative initiatives via social media can be effective in preventing people from radicalization or can de-radicalize people. Specifically, they formulate the following research questions: (1) How can we conceptualize narratives and counter-narratives? (2) How are narratives and counter-narratives used via social media? (3) To what extent is it possible to use counter-narrative programs via social media to deradicalize individuals or prevent violent extremism? (4) What are the pre-requisites for a counter-narrative program for it to be effective? a. Which social media are most suitable and why? b. What can we learn from examples of counter-narrative programs that have been operational in other democratic countries? c. What can we learn from examples of social media campaigns in other domains, such as health care and environmental issues? d. What are the potential risks for unwanted side effects? (5) How can the potential effectiveness of such a counter-narrative program be determined? (6) What can be the role of the government in such a counter-narrative program? CONTENT: 1. Introduction 2. Radicalization, narritives and social media 3. De-radicalization through online counter-narritives campaigns? 4. What makes a counter-narritive campaign effective? 5. Determining the potential effectiveness of a program 6. The role of the government 7. Summary, conclusions, limitations and future directions
dc.publisherUniversity of Amsterdam - Department of Psychology/Department of Political Science
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWODC Rapport 2607
dc.subjectPreventie
dc.subjectTerrorismebestrijding
dc.subjectInternet
dc.subjectSociale media
dc.subjectExtremistische groepering
dc.subjectContra-terrorisme
dc.subjectJihad
dc.subjectVoorlichtingscampagne
dc.subjectOverheidsvoorlichting
dc.subjectCommunicatie
dc.subjectSalafisme
dc.subjectRadicalisering
dc.subjectSociaal netwerk
dc.titleDeveloping a social media response to radicalization
dc.title.alternativeThe role of counter-narratives in prevention of radicalization and de-radicalization
dc.typerapport
dc.identifier.project2607
refterms.dateFOA2021-01-22T13:13:27Z
html.description.abstractIn this report, the authors examine the extent to which counter-narrative initiatives via social media can be effective in preventing people from radicalization or can de-radicalize people. Specifically, they formulate the following research questions: (1) How can we conceptualize narratives and counter-narratives? (2) How are narratives and counter-narratives used via social media? (3) To what extent is it possible to use counter-narrative programs via social media to deradicalize individuals or prevent violent extremism? (4) What are the pre-requisites for a counter-narrative program for it to be effective? a. Which social media are most suitable and why? b. What can we learn from examples of counter-narrative programs that have been operational in other democratic countries? c. What can we learn from examples of social media campaigns in other domains, such as health care and environmental issues? d. What are the potential risks for unwanted side effects? (5) How can the potential effectiveness of such a counter-narrative program be determined? (6) What can be the role of the government in such a counter-narrative program? <P></P><b>CONTENT:</b> 1. Introduction 2. Radicalization, narritives and social media 3. De-radicalization through online counter-narritives campaigns? 4. What makes a counter-narritive campaign effective? 5. Determining the potential effectiveness of a program 6. The role of the government 7. Summary, conclusions, limitations and future directionsnl_NL
dc.identifier.tuduuid:09f086e0-30da-4e00-b81a-20ce8c66c483
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Amsterdam - Department of Psychology/Department of Political Science
dc.contributor.institutionVrije Universiteit Amsterdam
dc.contributor.institutionUtrecht University
dc.contributor.institutionWODC
dc.source.cityAmsterdam


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
2607_Volledige_Tekst_tcm28-286 ...
Size:
1.386Mb
Format:
PDF
Thumbnail
Name:
2607_Samenvatting_tcm28-286138.pdf
Size:
295.7Kb
Format:
PDF
Thumbnail
Name:
2607_Summary_tcm28-286137.pdf
Size:
145.1Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record