Auteur / Author
Voermans, W.Steunenberg, B.
Berglund (medew.)
Dimitrova, A. (medew.)
Kaeding, M. (medew.)
Mastenbroek, E. (medew.)
Meuwese, A. (medew.)
Romeijn, M. (medew.)
Organisatie / Institution
WODCUniversiteit Leiden, Departement Publiekrecht
Serie / Series
WODC Rapport 1124Trefwoorden / Keywords
SpanjeWet- en regelgeving
Vergelijkend onderzoek
Italie
Frankrijk
Duitsland
Eu-richtlijn
Denemarken
Groot-Brittannie
Europese unie
Project
1124
Metadata
Show full item recordTitel / Title
De omzetting van Europese richtlijnenOndertitel / Subtitle
Instrumenten, technieken en processen in zes lidstaten vergelekenSamenvatting
Het EU-recht neemt een steeds grotere plaats in en bepaalt voor meer dan 50% de Nederlandse rechtsorde. De implementatie van richtlijnen kost de nodige tijd en moeite. Een discussie is gaande over de wijze waarop en de snelheid waarmee implementatie plaats kan vinden. In 2006 an English translation was published by Wolf Legal Publishers, under the titel: The Transposition of EC Directives: A comparative study of instruments, techniques and processes in six Member States (see Link Wolf Legal Publishers on the right)Summary
In 2004, the Research and Documentation Centre (WODC) of the Ministry of Justice commissioned a group of researchers attached to the departments of Public Law and Public Administration Science at Leiden University to conduct a research project concerning the transposition of European directives in several Member States (Denmark, France, Spain, United Kingdom, Germany and Italy). The project was to focus special attention on the various legal instruments used in these countries and the manner in which these instruments affect the timeliness of transposition. The present report contains the results of this research project. Index Acknowledgements Summary and conclusions 1. Rationale and structure of the research project 2. Transposition of directives in the Netherlands 3. Transposition and the performance records of the various member states 4. Instruments and techniques 5. The national policy cycle 6. Discussions in the countries studied 7. Decisive factors in the transposition process 8. Conclusions and recommendations 9. Denmark 10. France 11. Spain 12. United Kingdom 13. Germany 14. Italy References Glossary of terms Members of the Advisory CommitteeUitgever / Publisher
Universiteit LeidenPublicatiedatum / publication date
2005Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
De prevalentie van huiselijk geweld en kindermishandeling in NederlandBoom, A. ten; Wittebrood, K.; Alink, L.R.A. (medew.); Cruyff, M.J.L.F. (medew.); Downes, R.E. (medew.); Eijkern, E.Y.M. van (medew.); Gils, G.H.C. van (medew.); Heijden, P.G.M. van der (medew.); Prevoo, M.J.L. (medew.); Ramakers, C.C. (medew.); et al. (WODC, 2019)This report describes a prevalence study regarding domestic violence and child maltreatment in the Netherlands, and developments in these areas since the previous reports on domestic violence (Van der Veen & Bogaerts, 2010; Van Dijk et al., 2010; Van der Heijden & Van Gils, 2009) and on child maltreatment (Alink et al., 2011). The research comprised various studies and was conducted at the request of the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport and the Ministry of Justice and Security by a number of research teams, and coordinated by the Research and Documentation Centre (WODC). In addition to three preliminary studies, the entire research comprised five empirical studies. Two studies focused primarily on estimating the extent of domestic violence among adults (Van Eijkern et al., 2018; Van der Heijden et al., 2019), two studies on estimating the extent of child maltreatment (Schellingerhout & Ramakers, 2017; Alink et al., 2018), while one was an in-depth investigation of individuals committing partner violence and child maltreatment (Woicik et al., 2018). This synthesis is strictly about the prevalence of domestic violence and child maltreatment.The key question of this synthesis was as follows: What is the nature and extent of domestic violence and child maltreatment in the Netherlands, which developments have taken place in this regard, and to what degree does co-occurrence exist of both types of violence in families?
-
Langetermijnmonitor 'Raadsman bij verhoor' - Eerste editieKlein Haarhuis, C.M.; Lierop, L. van (medew.); Aidala, R. (medew.); Beenakkers, E. (medew.); Vroome, T. de (medew.); Damen, R. (medew.); Maertens, G. (medew.); Burema, D. (medew.) (WODC, 2018)In The Netherlands, the right to consult a lawyer before being subject to a police interrogation has been effective since 2010. Since that time, minors have the right to lawyer assistance also during an interrogation. By March 1, 2016, this right of interrogation aid was extended to majors by way of temporary policy rules of the Public Prosecutor’s office and the Legal Aid Board (which were effective until March 1, 2017, when new legislation took effect).The main topic of this first edition of a ‘Long-term Monitor’ is this right to interrogation aid of majors, more specifically, the organisation and application during the first transition year. Particularly because the right to interrogation aid was introduced within a relatively short period, this study serves the objective of ‘monitoring the implementation and observe whether bottlenecks occur and, where necessary, make adaptations’, as explained by the (then) Minister of Security and Justice to Parliament in a letter of March 22, 2016.In this report, two main questions are addressed:1. How has the implementation of the right to interrogation aid been organised, on paper and in practice? 2. How has the right to interrogation aid been applied in practice, during the first year from March 1, 2016 to March 1, 2017?To answer these two questions, data were gathered from the following organisations: Police, Legal Aid Board, Public Prosecutor’s Office, Royal Military Police, special prosecuting agencies, the legal profession and/or legal aid lawyers.
-
Vijf jaar lokale projecten Polarisatie en Radicalisering - resultaatinventarisatie over de periode 2007-2011Guldener, V.R. van; Potman, H.P.; Bennekom, F. van (medew.); Heetkamp, A. (medew.); Heijnen, R. (medew.); Mussche, M. (medew.); Veldman, I. (medew.); Westra, J. (medew.); Zelm, E. van (medew.) (KplusV organisatieadvies, 2012)Onderzoek gestart onder projectbegeleiding van Directie Kennisontwikkeling voor Openbaar Bestuur en Veiligheid (BZK) en per 1/1/2011 voortgezet onder projectbegeleiding van de afdeling Extern Wetenschappelijke Betrekkingen (WODC). Dit rapport geeft een overzicht van de projecten waarvoor in de periode 2007-2011 een bijdrage in het kader van de tijdelijke subsidieregeling of een decentralisatie-uitkering is verleend om uitvoering te geven aan het lokale spoor van het Actieplan Polarisatie en Radicalisering 2007-2011. Het doel van deze resultaatinventarisatie is: de opzet en uitvoering van de projecten inzichtelijk te maken; het bereik van projecten en aanpak inzichtelijk te maken; het resultaat van projecten en aanpakken te inventariseren; de beleids- en programmatheorie van tien geselecteerde projecten inzichtelijk te maken; te leren voor volgende projecten en aanpakken. INHOUD: 1. Inleiding 2. Het onderzoek 3. Projecten en programma's 4. Wat valt op? 5. Beleidstheorie ontrafeld 6. Conclusies