Categorical accommodation and assistance for victims of trafficking in human beings

Kulu-Glasgow, I.; Galloway, A.M.; Beenakkers, E.M.T.; Smit, M.; Zwenk, F.

dc.contributor.author	Kulu-Glasgow, I.
dc.contributor.author	Galloway, A.M.
dc.contributor.author	Beenakkers, E.M.T.
dc.contributor.author	Smit, M.
dc.contributor.author	Zwenk, F.
dc.coverage.spatial	Nederland
dc.date.accessioned	2021-01-20T08:53:17Z
dc.date.available	2021-01-20T08:53:17Z
dc.date.issued	2012
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12832/117
dc.description.abstract	The aim of this research is to look at the experiences that other European countries have had with categorical accommodation and assistance for adult victim of trafficking in human beings, and present an overview of the organisation and implementation of shelters in these countries. This includes descriptions of the bottlenecks these countries have experienced, any possible solutions they have employed, and the perceived advantages and disadvantages of categorical accommodation and assistance. CONTENT: 1. Introduction 2. Belgium 3. Czech Republic 4. Italy 5. Spain 6. Conclusion
dc.publisher	WODC
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Cahiers 2012-08
dc.subject	Belgie
dc.subject	Spanje
dc.subject	Slachtofferhulp
dc.subject	Vergelijkend onderzoek
dc.subject	Italie
dc.subject	Mensenhandel
dc.subject	Slachtoffers
dc.subject	Tsjechie
dc.subject	Opvang
dc.title	Categorical accommodation and assistance for victims of trafficking in human beings
dc.title.alternative	a study of four European countries
dc.type	rapport
dc.identifier.project	1925
refterms.dateFOA	2021-01-20T08:53:17Z
html.description.abstract	The aim of this research is to look at the experiences that other European countries have had with categorical accommodation and assistance for adult victim of trafficking in human beings, and present an overview of the organisation and implementation of shelters in these countries. This includes descriptions of the bottlenecks these countries have experienced, any possible solutions they have employed, and the perceived advantages and disadvantages of categorical accommodation and assistance. <P></P><b>CONTENT:</b> 1. Introduction 2. Belgium 3. Czech Republic 4. Italy 5. Spain 6. Conclusion	nl_NL
dc.identifier.tud	uuid:8ec1f467-cfc6-4b87-a3db-b32a46da22a3
dc.contributor.institution	WODC
dc.source.city	Den Haag